<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Software Integrity Ltd &#187; No Category</title>
	<atom:link href="http://software-integrity.com/blog/category/nocategory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://software-integrity.com/blog</link>
	<description>Realtime and Embedded Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:32:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>ARM Cortex PendSV problem &amp; solution(?)</title>
		<link>http://software-integrity.com/blog/2011/09/27/arm-cortex-pendsv-problem-solution/</link>
		<comments>http://software-integrity.com/blog/2011/09/27/arm-cortex-pendsv-problem-solution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Bushell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[No Category]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://software-integrity.com/blog/?p=765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone using PendSV on Cortex (e.g. to implement an RTOS scheduler) should read this! [Edited 29/09/11] It appears that there may or may not be a problem; the argument continues on the Embedded Gurus blog. If you&#8217;re tinkering with PendSV, it would be good to read the article (and the comments to it) anyway. &#160; [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://software-integrity.com/blog/2011/09/27/arm-cortex-pendsv-problem-solution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The meaning of ESC</title>
		<link>http://software-integrity.com/blog/2009/10/09/the-meaning-of-esc/</link>
		<comments>http://software-integrity.com/blog/2009/10/09/the-meaning-of-esc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Bushell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[No Category]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://software-integrity.com/blog/?p=223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some wistful thinking, as a break from blogging about SKC++. I spent the last two days at the ESC in Farnborough, UK. Would that be: Embedded Systems Conference, or Embedded System Complication, or Embedded System Confusion? Or all three? I went to 1, experienced 2 and came away suffering from 3. Like the PC industry, [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://software-integrity.com/blog/2009/10/09/the-meaning-of-esc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome!</title>
		<link>http://software-integrity.com/blog/2009/09/08/welcome/</link>
		<comments>http://software-integrity.com/blog/2009/09/08/welcome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Bushell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[No Category]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://software-integrity.com/blog/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you can gather, I have just started this blog, which is an extension of Software Integrity&#8217;s main website. I will be airing many topics here, but all in the field of Real Time and Embedded Software. I hope you will find it interesting and I welcome your feedback on the articles I post here. [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://software-integrity.com/blog/2009/09/08/welcome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

