<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Software Integrity Ltd &#187; Mutual Exclusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://software-integrity.com/blog/category/rtos/mutual-exclusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://software-integrity.com/blog</link>
	<description>Realtime and Embedded Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 14:40:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Exclusion Is Not Always Mutual</title>
		<link>http://software-integrity.com/blog/2010/06/26/exclusion-is-not-always-mutual/</link>
		<comments>http://software-integrity.com/blog/2010/06/26/exclusion-is-not-always-mutual/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 13:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Bushell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mutual Exclusion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://software-integrity.com/blog/?p=649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most embedded software practitioners &#8211; sadly, not all &#8211; know that some form of what is normally called &#8220;Mutual Exclusion&#8221; is necessary when a read-write resource is shared among two or more concurrent activities, particularly (but not necessarily only) when test-and-set operations are involved. The expression &#8220;Mutual Exclusion&#8221; is so entrenched as a generic concept [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://software-integrity.com/blog/2010/06/26/exclusion-is-not-always-mutual/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SKC++: Mutual Exclusion</title>
		<link>http://software-integrity.com/blog/2009/12/02/skc-mutual-exclusion/</link>
		<comments>http://software-integrity.com/blog/2009/12/02/skc-mutual-exclusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Bushell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mutual Exclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RTOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SKC++]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://software-integrity.com/blog/?p=438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a short article today as SKC++&#8217;s mutual exclusion facilities follow a familiar pattern: It seemed like a good idea to provide another abstract interface as there can, in principle, be several kinds of mutex. The one I chose as &#8220;standard&#8221; for SKC++ is the priority-inheritance mutex. Fortunately, I don&#8217;t have to explain the ins [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://software-integrity.com/blog/2009/12/02/skc-mutual-exclusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

